Big Liberal Lie: No Weapons of Mass Destruction

Remember the most famous line that sunk John Kerry's futile bid for the Presidency in 2004? He said, "I actually did vote FOR the $87 billion before I voted AGAINST it!" Kerry was talking about his flip-flop votes on funding for the war on terrorism (Liberal wackos call this the War in Iraq). Flip-flop voting played a key role in Kerry's defeat in 2004, but he is not the only Liberal nutcase to show two faces to the world - especially when it comes to weapons of mass destruction.

In a letter to President Clinton (dated October 9, 1998) Senators Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others wrote: "We urge you after consulting with Congress and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."

Two months later, Nancy Pelosi followed up with a similar request, saying: "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is is threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Not to be outdone, Hillary Rodham-Clinton reported in October 2002 that "Intelligence shows Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock." Ted Kennedy also had a few well-chosen words about the WMD situation.

These five Liberal wackos have since changed their tune. They are now completely denying the existence of chemical or biological weapons in Iraq. Nancy Pelosi has risen to the highest ranks in the Appropriations Committee. Hillary Rodham-Clinton has started all-out campaigning. But they know the truth, my Conservative friend! They know Saddam has stashed his weapons in a safe place. Will we find these weapons before we suffer another devastating attack on American soil? You can bet Hillary wants to be the one in the White House when that happens.